Press Releases

Statement by Jeff Carlisle, Executive Vice President for Regulatory Affairs and Public Policy at LightSquared

RESTON, Va., October 27, 2011 – The GPS industry has been saying for months that there is no solution to interference caused by GPS devices that “look in” to neighboring spectrum licensed to LightSquared. Nonetheless, in a matter of weeks three private sector companies have now announced inexpensive solutions that eliminate interference for the high precision devices in question. In fact, we announced another collaboration today with global device maker PCTEL which has developed an antenna that will allow existing high precision users to retrofit their GPS devices to make them compatible with LightSquared’s network.

The GPS industry, led by Trimble — a $5 billion company, with a direct financial stake in the outcome of this debate — continues in desperation to politicize a complex technical matter where several engineering solutions have been developed. Today, those opposed to expanding wireless access for millions distributed alarming numbers based on an outdated plan to deliberately confuse reporters with scare tactics (note the number of caveats in their statement).

Our current proposal to move our spectrum further away from GPS's spectrum will cost LightSquared $100 million and solves the interference problem for mass consumer and industrial GPS devices. Additionally, the solutions currently under development are expected to get us to complete compatibility. LightSquared has also committed $50 million toward replacing/retrofitting government devices that experience interference. The interference issues were caused by the GPS industry not filtering their devices appropriately, and we call on them to fund their share of the solution for the remaining high precision devices through a standard recall.

The Top 5 Questions the GPS Industry Should Answer:

1) Isn’t it true that the so-called “non-biased” PNT Advisory Board, which advises the Pentagon, is represented by board members of GPS companies who have a financial stake in LightSquared not getting approval to proceed?

SEC filings show that PNT Chair Brad Parkinson sold $1.5 million worth of his Trimble stock within weeks of the FCC granting the waiver to LightSquared (see Trimble’s insider trading filings with the SEC). In sum, board members sold nearly $20 million worth of stock within three weeks of LightSquared being granted the FCC waiver – three times the highest amount of stock board members and top managers had unloaded in any one month going back to at least January 2007. This demonstrates that Trimble insiders clearly viewed LightSquared as a financial threat to its commercial business. And that explains Trimble's motivation in leading the public relations and lobbying campaign against LightSquared, even as LightSquared has committed upward of $160 million solving a problem that is of the GPS industry's making. Clearly, Dr. Parkinson cannot objectively advise the Pentagon or any other government agency if he is obligated as a Trimble board member to protect the fiduciary interests of the company's shareholders.

2) Numerous annual reports and SEC filings from GPS manufacturers going back to 2001 acknowledge material harm to their business due to interference with neighboring spectrum. Why did you not prepare your devices with filters if you’ve known for ten years there would be interference problems caused by your devices looking into adjacent spectrum?

In a 2006 filing, Trimble, wrote: “Many of our products use other radio frequency bands, together with the GPS signal, to provide enhanced GPS capabilities, such as real-time kinematic precision.” As early as 2001, Trimble also wrote that “emissions from mobile satellite services and other equipment operating in adjacent frequency bands . . . may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of our products.”

3) True or false? Did the GPS industry manufacture devices knowing there would be interference with neighboring spectrum because this enhanced their performance?

True. SEC documents dating back several years show that GPS makers were aware of the risks associated with using spectrum that was not licensed to them (see above). Although their warnings to investors were buried in their reports to the SEC, they did nothing to mitigate their own risk. Furthermore, in April 2011, the FCC reminded the GPS industry to be mindful of their spectrum neighbors: “In the case of GPS, we note that extensive terrestrial operations have been anticipated in the L-band for at least 8 years.”

4) Who funds the Coalition to Save Our GPS?

The Coalition is not set up as a 501(c)3, and therefore not subject to standard rules of transparency. Their outreach efforts do not follow lobbying regulations, and it is unclear which of the members listed on the Coalition’s website are the majority funders.

5) Did the GPS industry falsely claim that it would take billions of dollars and more than a decade to find a solution to this problem?

Yes. It took just a few weeks for several companies – JAVAD GNSS, PCTEL and Partron America to come up with their solutions to the interference problem –
engineering solutions that will undoubtedly benefit the industry with lower costs and more innovation.

About LightSquared

LightSquared’s mission is to revolutionize the U.S. wireless industry. With the creation of the first-ever, wholesale-only nationwide 4G-LTE network integrated with satellite coverage, LightSquared offers people the speed, value and reliability of universal connectivity, wherever they are in the United States. As a wholesale-only operator, LightSquared will deploy an open 4G wireless broadband network to be used by existing and new service providers to sell their own devices, applications and services – at a competitive cost and without retail competition from LightSquared. The deployment and operation of LightSquared’s network represent more than $14 billion of private investment over the next eight years. For more information about LightSquared, please go to www.LightSquared.com, www.facebook.com/LightSquared and www.twitter.com/LightSquared.

# # #


Chris Stern
Burson-Marsteller for LightSquared
Tel: (202) 530-4737

Forward Looking Statement:

This release contains forward-looking statements and information regarding LightSquared and its business. Such statements are based on the current expectations and certain assumptions of LightSquared’s management and are, therefore, subject to certain risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements expressed herein relate only to information as of the date of this release. LightSquared has no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this release, nor is there any assurance that the plans or strategies discussed in this release will not change.


Sign up to receive emails letting
you know when important news
has been added to this website.


  • “If the FCC truly wants more spectrum … in the wireless market, it will grant LightSquared permission to operate.” –Scott Wallsten, The Hill (9.25.15)
  • “The LightSquared spectrum, because it is licensed and doesn't need to be auctioned, can be deployed for mobile broadband far more quickly than other spectrum blocks …The failure of the FCC to do what is necessary to bring the LightSquared spectrum online is costing consumers an estimated $120 billion in foregone benefits.” –Dr. Thomas M. Lenard, The Hill (9.22.15)


Tom Surface

Ashley Durmer

Michael Tucker

Investor Relations

Follow us online
Follow us on twitter Follow us on Facebook